Skip to main content

It’s You or Me

       The Bible starts with a picture of the “Garden of Eden” (Genesis 1) as a place of perfection where God’s glory was seen and where God himself walked among his people (Genesis 2:8).  It was “paradise” in every sense of the word.
  
          After sin entered the world (Genesis 3), another picture starts to emerge.  The focus shifts from “God and his glory” to the people and their desires.  Eventually, they get together and say, “Come, let us build ourselves a city, with a tower that reaches to the heavens, so that we may make a name for ourselves” (Genesis 11:4).  Notice the words “us”, “ourselves”, “we” and “ourselves” (again) in that sentence.  God has been moved out of the spotlight.

            Those two pictures, the “Garden of Eden” on one hand and the “Tower of Babel” on the other, represent the two paths that we can choose in this life.  One is “God-honouring” and the other is “self-honouring”.  One is “outward-focused” and the other is ‘inward-focused”.  Life is either filled with pronouns like “Him”, “you” and “yours” (thinking primarily about God and others) or it is dominated by words like “me”, “myself” and “I”. 

            Interestingly, Jesus constantly put people at this crossroads and asked them to choose their path.  For example, Nicodemus, who came to see Jesus secretly at night, is told that he must make a stand, be “born again” and “walk in the light” (John 3).  A rich young man, whose devotion to God was not quite as strong as his devotion to his “stuff”, is told, “Sell everything you have and give to the poor… then come follow me” (Mark 10:21).  Matthew is challenged to leave his crooked, but lucrative, tax-collecting business so that he could follow Christ (Matthew 9:9-13).  Those choices were difficult and each of them came with a significant cost, but Jesus never wavered or bargained with people.  He continued to say, “Follow me, or follow your own path”, because that was (and is) the decision that each person had to make.  It has to be one or the other.  It cannot be both.

            Even as I write this it sounds too harsh and too strict.  I really want to modify the message and make it easier.  However, the fact is that there are the only two choices and they lead to very different places. 

            Which path are you on?

            “Enter through the narrow gate. For wide is the gate and broad is the road that leads to destruction, and many enter through it. But small is the gate and narrow the road that leads to life, and only a few find it” (Matthew 7:13-14).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don’t Be a Tourist

                  From the moment that God told Abraham to leave his home and follow him (Genesis 12:1-3), God’s people have understood that they are on a journey.                 That being true, the essential question becomes, “How are you making that journey?”   T here are two options: You can be a tourist or you can be a pilgrim.                   Tourists leave their real life behind for a little while so that they can visit another place.   Generally, they travel in groups and do not mix much with the local people.   They hit the highlights of various regions, but they do not really experience what it is like to live in that part of t...

Darkness to Light (Colossians 1:9-14)

 Our transition from lost to found is a gift of God. It is because of God’s grace and Jesus’ sacrifice.  However, our growth in that new life is at least partially our responsibility. So, what needs evaluation?  Where should this growth begin? What does it look like to walk in the light? Colossians 1 highlights three starting spots.  https://youtu.be/1nWWWj4awh8  

New Article: A Spiritual Apgar Score

                  As recently as the 1950s, having a baby was a risky proposition.   One in thirty births ended badly until an anesthesiologist named Virginia Apgar developed a system to rate how newborns were doing.   She focused on five key areas (appearance, pulse, the reflex action or grimace, activity or muscle tone and respiration).   She encouraged doctors and nurses to rate each child on a scale of zero to three for each quality.   A score of 10 or more meant that the baby was healthy; 4 or lower indicated that the baby needed immediate intervention.                While numerous other medical advances have occurred over the years, all agree that Apgar’s rating system had a huge impact. ...