Skip to main content

The Bible Means What it Says! (Unless I don’t like it??????)

                 After his encounter with the “Rich Young Ruler” (Mark 10:17-31), Jesus said, “It is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle that for a rich man to enter the kingdom of God!” (verse 25).
                When we came to that part, I asked the Bible study class how they had heard this verse explained.  One man raised his hand and said, “Apparently, there used to be a gate in the wall of Jerusalem and it was called ‘The Needle’s Eye’.  It was so small that a camel had to get down on its knees and crawl through it.  It could get in, but it was really difficult”.   Several people nodded their heads in agreement.  They had heard the same explanation.  Of course, I had too.
                There is only one problem:  It is not true!   It is a complete lie!  No such gate ever existed! 
Why, then, would almost everyone in the room know that story?  More to the point, why would the church teach something that is untrue?
                Could it be that we are looking for a way around what Jesus said? 
The point of the gate story is that the camel can get into the city if he humbles himself, lowers himself and crawls in.  The application then is that, with some effort, a rich man can keep his stuff and enter the kingdom without ever having to chose one or the other.
However, Jesus’ point is the exact opposite!  He says that if you want to love God and money at the same time, you are in big trouble.  You would have better luck pushing a camel through a needle’s eye.  Jesus is not saying that it is hard.  He is saying that it is impossible!
After hearing this, the disciples were amazed (Mark 10:26).  Other versions describe them as indignant, upset, or exasperated.  They clearly understood that there was no loophole here.  The choice was going to be love God or love money, but not both.
Now, it is worth noting that this conversation was motivated by love (verse 21).  Jesus challenged the young man to loosen his grip on material things, so that he could reach for eternal riches.  If he could become a “cheerful giver”, he would bless others instead of just himself and, in that way, he would begin to reflect the very nature of God.  In fact, he would be participating in God’s work and helping to draw others to Christ and the kingdom (see 2 Corinthians 9:6-14). 
We can try to side-step the truth.  We can make up stories about camels and gates.  We can make a big deal about the fact that Jesus did not tell everyone to “sell everything you have and give to the poor”.   We can point out that this was one command to one specific person.  If we try hard enough, we can negate this teaching, and the self-examination that goes with it.
However, Jesus also said, “No one can serve two masters. Either you will hate the one and love the other, or you will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money” (Luke 16:13).
That passage is uncomfortably clear! 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Don’t Be a Tourist

                  From the moment that God told Abraham to leave his home and follow him (Genesis 12:1-3), God’s people have understood that they are on a journey.                 That being true, the essential question becomes, “How are you making that journey?”   T here are two options: You can be a tourist or you can be a pilgrim.                   Tourists leave their real life behind for a little while so that they can visit another place.   Generally, they travel in groups and do not mix much with the local people.   They hit the highlights of various regions, but they do not really experience what it is like to live in that part of t...

Darkness to Light (Colossians 1:9-14)

 Our transition from lost to found is a gift of God. It is because of God’s grace and Jesus’ sacrifice.  However, our growth in that new life is at least partially our responsibility. So, what needs evaluation?  Where should this growth begin? What does it look like to walk in the light? Colossians 1 highlights three starting spots.  https://youtu.be/1nWWWj4awh8  

New Article: A Spiritual Apgar Score

                  As recently as the 1950s, having a baby was a risky proposition.   One in thirty births ended badly until an anesthesiologist named Virginia Apgar developed a system to rate how newborns were doing.   She focused on five key areas (appearance, pulse, the reflex action or grimace, activity or muscle tone and respiration).   She encouraged doctors and nurses to rate each child on a scale of zero to three for each quality.   A score of 10 or more meant that the baby was healthy; 4 or lower indicated that the baby needed immediate intervention.                While numerous other medical advances have occurred over the years, all agree that Apgar’s rating system had a huge impact. ...